If they are exposed, the defaults should be 0, with instructions in the manual on when to increase them. I think they should be zero if not exposed. > unconfigurable attack and release times? > explicitly wanted longer release times than attack? What are the > Why in a nutshell was attack and release removed? I thought we IMO it should not be exposed to the user - I cannot find a case where it does not damage the signal, and is no longer needed to mask “tinklebells” (which it didn’t do very well, anyway). > “Frequency Smoothing” should default to 0. ![]() It should be replaced with a variant of the “new method sensitivity” control. > The “Sensitivity” control, as now presented, does nothing. That is reason enough to include it in 2.1 over Noise Removal. Paul has fixed the “big problem” and the effect is now no longer broken. Noise Reduction is unquestionably superior to Noise Removal. > Yes, and in some cases DeNoise may be preferable. > Goldwave noise reduction was still preferable, but I admit I have not > James wrote:>What it still needs is clear instructions from Paul as to Given how big a consensus this has, I just wish it had been clear byĪnyway, yes, the change should be in for 2.1, and alphas for testing. ![]() Okay, I'm persuaded, please make the agreed change, per the
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |